翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Mosler TwinStar
・ Mosles
・ Mosley
・ Mosley (TV serial)
・ Mosley baronets
・ Mosley Common
・ Mosley Common Colliery
・ Mosley Creek
・ Mosley Hill Formation
・ Mosley Mayne
・ Mosley Music Group
・ Mosley Street
・ Mosley Street Metrolink station
・ Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd
・ Mosley v SARL Google
Mosley v United Kingdom
・ Mosley-Thompson Cirques
・ Mosling, Wisconsin
・ Moslins
・ Mosman (disambiguation)
・ Mosman Art Prize
・ Mosman Bay
・ Mosman Bay ferry wharf
・ Mosman bomb hoax
・ Mosman Cricket Club
・ Mosman Golf Club
・ Mosman High School
・ Mosman House
・ Mosman Library
・ Mosman Park railway station


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Mosley v United Kingdom : ウィキペディア英語版
Mosley v United Kingdom

''Mosley v United Kingdom'' () 53 E.H.R.R. 30; was a 2011 decision in the European Court of Human Rights regarding the right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. An application to the court was made by Max Mosley, former president of the FIA following his successful breach of confidence legal case against the ''News of the World'' (known as ''Mosley v News Group Newspapers'' () EWHC 1777 (QB)). In the case the court unanimously rejected the proposition that Article 8 required member states to legislate to prevent newspapers printing stories regarding individual's private lives without first warning the individuals concerned, instead holding that it fell within each state's margin of appreciation to determine whether to legislate on this matter.
==Application==
On 29 September 2008, Mosley filed an application to the Court claiming Articles 8 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights were breached by the United Kingdom failing to impose a legal duty on the ''News of the World'' to notify him in advance of publication of the story. This would allow him the opportunity to seek an interim injunction and thus prevent publication. If the Court decided that there was admissibility in the application,〔()〕 Mosley intended to argue that the damages awarded to him by the high court were an insufficient remedy.
Mosley then attempted to challenge the state of English privacy law by arguing for a doctrine of prior disclosure, which would require journalists to give at least two days' notice of intention to print stories about the misbehavior of a public figure. John Kampfner, the chief executive of the human rights group Index on Censorship, and author of ''Freedom for Sale'', argued that a doctrine of prior disclosure would stifle investigative journalism and damage press freedom.
In March 2010, a brief was filed to the European Court of Human Rights concerning the case, which has been fast-tracked through the system. The brief in opposition was prepared by renowned human rights lawyers Geoffrey Robertson QC and Mark Stephens at the instance of a host of media organisations including Media Legal Defence Initiative, Index on Censorship, European Publishers Council, the Media international Lawyers Association, Romainian Helsinki Committee, Global Witness, Media Law Resource Centre and The Bulgarian Access to Information Committee.〔() 〕 On 11 January 2011, a hearing was held by a Chamber of the Court.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Mosley v United Kingdom」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.